[2021] GCA045 - Barras, Watt and Orchard v Law Officers of the Crown

View printable version

Applications seeking leave to appeal against sentences. The Appellants also contended that the sentences imposed in their respective cases should be reviewed on certain other discrete grounds: the sentence is manifestly excessive; the guidelines in Richards are outdated; the sentence did not adequately distinguish the Appellant’s case from that of their co-accused; insufficient credit was afforded to the Appellant for their plea and personal mitigation; the sentence for the RIPL offence was manifestly excessive with there being no guideline case for that offence in Guernsey.